„Modell der inneren Familiensysteme“ – Versionsunterschied

Versionsgeschichte interaktiv durchsuchen
[ungesichtete Version][ungesichtete Version]
← Zum vorherigen VersionsunterschiedZum nächsten Versionsunterschied →
Inhalt gelöscht Inhalt hinzugefügt
VisuellWikitext
Importartikel
Markierung: Begriffsklärungsseiten-Links
→‎External links: Kat fix, Weblinks
Zeile 106: Zeile 106:
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


==External links==
==Weblinks==
* [https://www.ifs-europe.net IFS Europe e.V.]
* {{official|ifs-institute.com/}}


[[:Kategorie:Psychotherapie]]
<nowiki>
[[Category:Psychological models]]
[[Category:Psychotherapeutical theories]]
[[Category:Conceptions of self]]
</nowiki>

Version vom 28. Dezember 2023, 17:15 Uhr

Dieser Importartikel ist fälschlicherweise im Artikelnamensraum. Bitte verschiebe die Seite oder entferne diesen Baustein.
Dieser Artikel (Modell der inneren Familiensysteme) ist im Entstehen begriffen und noch nicht Bestandteil der freien Enzyklopädie Wikipedia.
Wenn du dies liest:
  • Der Text kann teilweise in einer Fremdsprache verfasst, unvollständig sein oder noch ungeprüfte Aussagen enthalten.
  • Wenn du Fragen zum Thema hast, nimm am besten Kontakt mit den Autoren auf.
Wenn du diesen Artikel überarbeitest:
  • Bitte denke daran, die Angaben im Artikel durch geeignete Quellen zu belegen und zu prüfen, ob er auch anderweitig den Richtlinien der Wikipedia entspricht (siehe Wikipedia:Artikel).
  • Nach erfolgter Übersetzung kannst du diese Vorlage entfernen und den Artikel in den Artikelnamensraum verschieben. Die entstehende Weiterleitung kannst du schnelllöschen lassen.
  • Importe inaktiver Accounts, die länger als drei Monate völlig unbearbeitet sind, werden gelöscht.

Vorlage:Short description

The Internal Family Systems Model (IFS) is an integrative approach to individual psychotherapy developed by Richard C. Schwartz in the 1980s.[1][2] It combines systems thinking with the view that the mind is made up of relatively discrete subpersonalities, each with its own unique viewpoint and qualities. IFS uses systems psychology, particularly as developed for family therapy, to understand how these collections of subpersonalities are organized.[3]

Parts

Vorlage:See also

IFS posits that the mind is made up of multiple parts, and underlying them is a person's core or true Self. Like members of a family, a person's inner parts can take on extreme roles or subpersonalities. Each part has its own perspective, interests, memories, and viewpoint. A core tenet of IFS is that every part has a positive intent, even if its actions are counterproductive and/or cause dysfunction. There is no need to fight with, coerce, or eliminate parts; the IFS method promotes internal connection and harmony to bring the mind back into balance.

IFS therapy aims to heal wounded parts and restore mental balance. The first step is to access the core Self and then, from there, understand the different parts in order to heal them.

In the IFS model, there are three general types of parts:[4]

  1. Exiles represent psychological trauma, often from childhood, and they carry the pain and fear. Exiles may become isolated from the other parts and polarize the system. Managers and Firefighters try to protect a person's consciousness by preventing the Exiles' pain from coming to awareness.[5]
  2. Managers take on a preemptive, protective role. They influence the way a person interacts with the external world, protecting the person from harm and preventing painful or traumatic experiences from flooding the person's conscious awareness.
  3. Firefighters emerge when Exiles break out and demand attention. They work to divert attention away from the Exile's hurt and shame, which leads to impulsive and/or inappropriate behaviors like overeating, drug use or violence. They can also distract a person from pain by excessively focusing attention on more subtle activities such as overworking or overmedicating.

The internal system

IFS focuses on the relationships between parts and the core Self. The goal of therapy is to create a cooperative and trusting relationship between the Self and each part.

There are three primary types of relationships between parts: protection, polarization, and alliance.[6]

  1. Protection is provided by Managers and Firefighters. They intend to spare Exiles from harm and protect the individual from the Exile's pain.
  2. Polarization occurs between two parts that battle each other to determine how a person feels or behaves in a certain situation. Each part believes that it must act as it does in order to counter the extreme behavior of the other part. IFS has a method for working with polarized parts.
  3. Alliance is formed between two different parts if they're working together to accomplish the same goal.

IFS method

IFS practitioners report a well-defined therapeutic method for individual therapy based on the following principles. In this description, the term "protector" refers to either a manager or firefighter.

  • Parts in extreme roles carry "burdens", which are painful emotions or negative beliefs that they have taken on as a result of past harmful experiences, often in childhood. These burdens are not intrinsic to the part and therefore they can be released or "unburdened" through IFS therapy, allowing the part to assume its natural healthy role.
  • The Self is the agent of psychological healing. Therapists help their clients to access and remain in Self, providing guidance along the way.
  • Protectors usually can't let go of their protective roles and transform until the Exiles they are protecting have been unburdened.
  • There is no attempt to work with Exiles until the client has obtained permission from the Protectors who are protecting it. This allegedly makes the method relatively safe, even in working with traumatized parts.
  • The Self is the natural leader of the internal system. However, because of past harmful incidents or relationships, Protectors have stepped in and taken over for the Self. One Protector after another is activated and takes the lead, causing dysfunctional behavior. Protectors are also frequently in conflict with each other, resulting in internal chaos or stagnation. The aim is for the Protectors to trust the Self and allow it to lead the system, creating internal harmony under its guidance.

The first step is to help the client access the Self. Next, the Self gets to know the Protector(s), its positive intent, and develops a trusting relationship with it. Then, with the Protector's permission, the client accesses the Exile(s) to uncover the childhood incident or relationship which is the source of the burden(s) it carries. The Exile is retrieved from the past situation and guided to release its burdens. Finally, the Protector can then let go of its protective role and assume a healthy one.[7]

Critiques

Therapists Sharon A. Deacon and Jonathan C. Davis suggested that working with one's parts may "be emotional and anxiety-provoking for clients", and that IFS may not work well with delusional, paranoid, or schizophrenic clients who may not be grounded in reality and therefore misuse the idea of "parts".[8]

See also

References

Vorlage:Reflist

Further reading

Books

Vorlage:Refbegin

  • Douglas C. Breunlin, Richard C. Schwartz, Betty Mac Kune-Karrer: Metaframeworks: transcending the models of family therapy (= The Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1992, ISBN 1-55542-426-0.
  • Katherine J. Michelson: 101 more interventions in family therapy (= Haworth marriage and the family). Haworth Press, New York 1998, ISBN 0-7890-0058-X, Mapping multiplicity: an application of the internal family systems model, S. 426–430.
  • Richard C. Schwartz: Case studies in couple and family therapy: systemic and cognitive perspectives (= The Guilford family therapy series). Guilford Press, New York 1998, ISBN 1-57230-297-6, Internal family systems family therapy, S. 331–352.
  • Richard C. Schwartz: The plural self: multiplicity in everyday life. SAGE Publications, London; Thousand Oaks, CA 1999, ISBN 0-7619-6075-9, The internal family systems model, S. 238–253.
  • Richard C. Schwartz: The intimate couple. Brunner/Mazel, Philadelphia 1999, ISBN 0-87630-880-9, The self-to-self connection: intimacy and the internal family systems model, S. 263–275.
  • Laura M. Johnson, Richard C. Schwartz: Children in therapy: using the family as a resource. Hrsg.: C. Everett Bailey (= A Norton professional book). W. W. Norton & Company, New York 2000, ISBN 0-393-70289-8, Internal family systems work with children and families, S. 73–111.
  • Richard C. Schwartz, Michi Rose: Theories and strategies of family therapy. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA 2002, ISBN 0-205-27403-X, Internal family systems therapy, S. 275–295.
  • Michael P. Nichols, Richard C. Schwartz: Family therapy: concepts and methods. 7th Auflage. Pearson Education/Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA 2006, ISBN 0-205-47809-3 ( [1984]).
  • Tom Holmes: Parts Work: An Illustrated Guide to Your Inner Life. Winged Heart Press, 2007, ISBN 978-0-9798897-1-4.
  • Richard C. Schwartz, Mark F. Schwartz, Lori Galperin: Treating complex traumatic stress disorders: an evidence-based guide. Guilford Press, New York 2009, ISBN 978-1-60623-039-8, Internal family systems therapy, S. 353–370.
  • Richard C. Schwartz, Adrian J. Blow: Clinical casebook of couple therapy. Hrsg.: Alan S. Gurman. Guilford Press, New York 2010, ISBN 978-1-60623-676-5, Creating self-to-self intimacy: internal family systems therapy with couples, 375–398 (archive.org).
  • Bruce Ecker, Robin Ticic, Laurel Hulley: Unlocking the emotional brain: eliminating symptoms at their roots using memory reconsolidation. Routledge, New York 2012, ISBN 978-0-415-89716-7.
  • Richard C. Schwartz: Family therapy review: contrasting contemporary models. Hrsg.: Anne Hearon Rambo. Routledge, New York 2013, ISBN 978-0-415-80662-6, Internal family systems, S. 196–199.
  • Internal family systems therapy: new dimensions. Routledge, New York 2013, ISBN 978-0-415-50683-0.
  • Patricia L. Papernow: Surviving and thriving in stepfamily relationships: what works and what doesn't. Routledge, New York 2013, ISBN 978-0-415-89437-1.
  • Arthur G. Mones: Transforming troubled children, teens, and their families: an internal family systems model for healing. Routledge, New York 2014, ISBN 978-0-415-74421-8.
  • Richard C. Schwartz, Flint Sparks: Mindfulness-oriented interventions for trauma: integrating contemplative practices. Guilford Press, New York 2015, ISBN 978-1-4625-1858-6, The internal family systems model in trauma treatment: parallels with Mahayana Buddhist theory and practice, S. 125–139.
  • Toni Herbine-Blank: Techniques for the couple therapist: essential interventions from the experts. Routledge, New York 2016, ISBN 978-1-138-81460-8, Tracking protective sequences in internal family systems therapy, S. 133–136.
  • Janina Fisher: Healing the fragmented selves of trauma survivors: overcoming internal self-alientation. Routledge, New York 2017, ISBN 978-0-415-70822-7.
  • Amy Yandel Grabowski: An internal family systems guide to recovery from eating disorders: healing part by part. Routledge, New York 2017, ISBN 978-1-138-74520-9.
  • Lisa Spiegel: Internal family systems therapy with children. Routledge, New York 2017, ISBN 978-1-138-68210-8.
  • Innovations and elaborations in internal family systems therapy. Routledge, New York 2017, ISBN 978-1-138-02438-0.

Vorlage:Refend

Peer-reviewed articles

Vorlage:Refbegin

  • Joyce H. Vesper: Review of Internal Family Systems Therapy. In: Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 33. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, April 1996, S. 154–155, doi:10.1037/h0092358.
  • Marci A. Barton, Richard J. Bischoff: Rocks and rituals in producing therapeutic change. In: Journal of Family Psychotherapy. 9. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, Juli 1998, S. 31–41, doi:10.1300/J085V09N03_03.
  • Linda Wark, Melanie Thomas, Sahri Peterson: Internal family systems therapy for children in family therapy. In: Journal of Marital & Family Therapy. 27. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, April 2001, S. 189–200, doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb01156.x, PMID 11314552.
  • Christyn L. Dolbier, Mike Soderstrom, Mary A. Steinhardt: The relationships between self-leadership and enhanced psychological, health, and work outcomes. In: The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied. 135. Jahrgang, Nr. 5, September 2001, S. 469–485, doi:10.1080/00223980109603713, PMID 11804002.
  • Majie Lavergne: Art therapy and internal family systems therapy: an integrative model to treat trauma among adjudicated teenage girls. In: Canadian Art Therapy Association Journal. 17. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, März 2004, S. 17–36, doi:10.1080/08322473.2004.11432257.
  • Bobbi J. Miller, Jose Ruben Parra Cardona, Michael Hardin: The use of narrative therapy and internal family systems with survivors of childhood sexual abuse: examining issues related to loss and oppression. In: Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 18. Jahrgang, Nr. 4, Februar 2007, S. 1–27, doi:10.1300/J086v18n04_01.
  • Sean D. Davis, Fred P. Piercy: What clients of couple therapy model developers and their former students say about change, part I: model-dependent common factors across three models. In: Journal of Marital & Family Therapy. 33. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, Juli 2007, S. 318–343, doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00030.x, PMID 17598781.
  • Arthur G. Mones, Richard C. Schwartz: The functional hypothesis: a family systems contribution toward an understanding of the healing process of the common factors. In: Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. 17. Jahrgang, Nr. 4, Dezember 2007, S. 314–329, doi:10.1037/1053-0479.17.4.314.
  • Erica J. Wilkins: Using an IFS informed intervention to treat African American families surviving sexual abuse: one family's story. In: Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 19. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, Dezember 2007, S. 37–53, doi:10.1300/J086v19n03_03.
  • Eric J. Green: Individuals in conflict: an internal family systems approach. In: The Family Journal. 16. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, April 2008, S. 125–131, doi:10.1177/1066480707313789.
  • Shobha Pais: A systemic approach to the treatment of dissociative identity disorder. In: Journal of Family Psychotherapy. 20. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, März 2009, S. 72–88, doi:10.1080/08975350802716566.
  • Martha Sweezy: Treating trauma after dialectical behavioral therapy. In: Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. 21. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, März 2011, S. 90–102, doi:10.1037/a0023011.
  • Richard C. Schwartz: Moving from acceptance toward transformation with Internal Family Systems Therapy (IFS). In: Journal of Clinical Psychology. 69. Jahrgang, Nr. 8, August 2013, S. 805–816, doi:10.1002/jclp.22016, PMID 23813465.
  • Yvonne Makidon: Trailhead intervention. In: Journal of Family Psychotherapy. 25. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, Januar 2014, S. 83–86, doi:10.1080/08975353.2014.881700.
  • Carl Mojta, Mariana K. Falconier, Angela J. Huebner: Fostering self-awareness in novice therapists using Internal Family Systems therapy. In: The American Journal of Family Therapy. 42. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, Januar 2014, S. 67–78, doi:10.1080/01926187.2013.772870.
  • Ryan B. Seedall: Review of Internal Family Systems Therapy: New Dimensions. In: Journal of Marital & Family Therapy. 40. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, April 2014, S. 262–263, doi:10.1111/jmft.12033.
  • David A. Hoffman: What the #@!* are they fighting about?!?: reflections on fairness, identity, social capital, and peacemaking in family conflicts. In: Family Court Review. 53. Jahrgang, Nr. 4, Oktober 2015, S. 509–516, doi:10.1111/fcre.12171.
  • Shelley A. Haddock, Lindsey M. Weiler, Lisa J. Trump, Kimberly L. Henry: The efficacy of internal family systems therapy in the treatment of depression among female college students: a pilot study. In: Journal of Marital & Family Therapy. 43. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, Januar 2017, S. 131–144, doi:10.1111/jmft.12184, PMID 27500908.
  • Rebecca J. Lester: Self‐governance, psychotherapy, and the subject of managed care: internal family systems therapy and the multiple self in a US eating‐disorders treatment center. In: American Ethnologist. 44. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, Februar 2017, S. 23–35, doi:10.1111/amet.12423.
  • Cayla Minaiy, Natalie Johnson, Tim Ciochon, Dustin Perkins: Adaptability of family therapy modalities in the treatment of lesbian and gay clients with bulimia nervosa. In: Contemporary Family Therapy. 39. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, Juni 2017, S. 121–131, doi:10.1007/s10591-017-9410-5.
  • Jesse A. Smith, Nicholas D. Hayes, Sara Smock Jordan: Systemic integration of IFS therapy and 12-step facilitation for substance use: a theoretical discussion. In: Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly. 37. Jahrgang, Juli 2018, S. 60–74, doi:10.1080/07347324.2018.1502032.
  • Rebecca Lucero, Adam C. Jones, Jacob C. Hunsaker: Using internal family systems theory in the treatment of combat veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder and their families. In: Contemporary Family Therapy. 40. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, September 2018, S. 266–275, doi:10.1007/s10591-017-9424-z.

Vorlage:Refend

Kategorie:Psychotherapie

  1. ↑ Amanda J. Minor: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Marriage, Family, and Couples Counseling. SAGE Publications, 2016, ISBN 978-1-4833-6956-3, Internal Family Systems Model (englisch, google.com [abgerufen am 28. Januar 2020]): “The Internal Family Systems (IFS) model was developed by Richard C. Schwartz in the 1980s and describes and integrative, nonpathological approach to psychotherapy.... The premise of IFS is that similar to the complex external family system, individuals are composed of separate and multifaceted internal parts in relationship with each other. IFS's primary focus is to work with individuals and help differentiate parts or subpersonalities in the mind.”
  2. ↑ Sadye L. M. Logan: Encyclopedia of Social Work. Oxford University Press, USA, 2008, ISBN 978-0-19-530661-3, Family: Overview, S. 2:175–182 (englisch, google.com).
  3. ↑ Nancy Burgoyne: Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer International Publishing, 2018, ISBN 978-3-319-15877-8, Schwartz, Richard C, S. 1–2, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_927-1 (englisch): “[Schwartz] brought family therapy theory and technique to the intrapsychic worlds of clients and, in so doing, discovered ways of working with individuals, couples, and families that is unique and evidence-based. IFS has become not only a school of family therapy but also a major form of psychotherapy in general, with a vast literature and training institutes throughout the world.”
  4. ↑ Derek Scott: Principles and practice of grief counseling. Springer Publishing Company, 2012, ISBN 978-0-8261-0873-9, Grief and the Internal Family System, S. 168–169: „The "parts" in this model may be understood to be autonomous aspects of the personality that have specific roles. [...] The exiled parts hold extreme feelings or beliefs about themselves.... When these vulnerable parts get triggered, other parts jump up to distract us from them and these reactive protective parts are termed "firefighters." [...] The other group of protectors in the system are referred to as "managers," and they seek to ensure that the vulnerable parts do not get triggered.“
  5. ↑ Martha Sweezy: The Teenager's Confession: Regulating Shame in Internal Family Systems Therapy. In: American Journal of Psychotherapy. 65. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, April 2011, S. 179–188, doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2011.65.2.179, PMID 21847894 (englisch): “Therapeutic work with parts can help to unpack an amalgamated experience of shame like Angie’s into its component parts, differentiating its origin from the ways in which it is maintained.”
  6. ↑ Robert M. Carlisle: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Theory in Counseling and Psychotherapy. SAGE Publications, 2015, ISBN 978-1-4833-4649-6, Internal Family Systems Model, S. 567–569 (englisch, google.com [abgerufen am 28. Januar 2020]): “The internal system consists of the types of relationships between each of the parts and the self. The three primary relationships consist of protection, polarization, and alliance.”
  7. ↑ Bessel A. Van der Kolk: The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Penguin Books, 2015, ISBN 978-0-14-312774-1, S. 286 (englisch, google.com): “The task of the therapist is to help patients separate this confusing blend into separate entities.... Patients learn to put their fear, rage, or disgust on hold and open up into states of curiosity and self-reflection. From the stable perspective of Self they can begin constructive inner dialogues with their parts.”
  8. ↑ Sharon A. Deacon, Jonathan C. Davis: Internal Family Systems Theory: A Technical Integration. In: Journal of Systemic Therapies. 20. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, März 2001, S. 45–58, doi:10.1521/jsyt.20.1.45.19410: „Parts work can be emotional and anxiety-provoking for clients and therapists must have a rationale and direction in order to guide clients on such internal journeys. [...] Although Schwartz may disagree, we believe that IFS therapy, in general, may not work well with delusional, paranoid, or schizophrenic clients. Clients who are not grounded in reality may misuse the idea of "parts" or become more entrenched in delusional thoughts by such interventions.“
Quelle: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Modell_der_inneren_Familiensysteme&diff=next&oldid=240546087