Home
Wissen
Grundwissen
Ernährung
Deutschland
Weltfakten
E-Commerce
Tutorials
Studieren
Wissenschaft
Podcasts
BAMlive
Webtools
Währungstabelle aktuell
Home
Wissen
Grundwissen
Ernährung
Deutschland
Weltfakten
E-Commerce
Tutorials
Studieren
Wissenschaft
Podcasts
BAMlive
Webtools
Währungstabelle aktuell
Kontaktiere uns
Home
Wissen
Grundwissen
Ernährung
Deutschland
Weltfakten
E-Commerce
Tutorials
Studieren
Wissenschaft
Podcasts
BAMlive
Webtools
Währungstabelle aktuell
Home
Wissen
Grundwissen
Ernährung
Deutschland
Weltfakten
E-Commerce
Tutorials
Studieren
Wissenschaft
Podcasts
BAMlive
Webtools
Währungstabelle aktuell
Home
Wissen
Deutschland
Geschichte
Deutschland – Geschichte Deutschlands seit 1990
Deutschland – Geschichte Deutschlands seit 1990
Mandy Rice-Davies Applies: This page in a nutshell: Whether or not someone has denied unsavory allegations — though such a denial may not merit being given equal weight in an article — a worthless shitpost should still be included.
← Back to Contents
View Latest Issue
4 December 2023
File:Mandy Rice-Davies Applies.jpg
Joop van Bilsen
PD
Some people say that
Wikipedia:Mandy Rice-Davies applies
.
Some say that
Wikipedia:Mandy Rice-Davies does not apply
.
But at the end of the day, there's one thing we know for certain:
She would, wouldn't she?
^
https://www-oxfordreference-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/acref/9780199237173.001.0001/q-author-00001-00002860?rskey=sNUpqj&result=3
Willkommen bei Campus1.de
Facebook-f
Twitter
Youtube
Pinterest-p
Wissen
Automated Chatbot
Data Security
Virtual Reality
Communication
Support
Über uns
Impressum
Datenschutz
Company
About Us
Services
Features
Our Pricing
Latest News
© 2024 campus1.de
Discuss this story
This seems to have caused a gratuitous amount of offense, including being blanked for a speedy deletion request not once but twice. I can understand not thinking it's funny — I would put it in the bottom decile of jokes I've made — but I have asked numerous times and failed to get any sort of explanation of the offense going on here. I asked some of my friends in real life, ranging across various ages and genders and political inclinations etc, to read this and see what the problem was (perhaps "Rice-Davies" is some kind of ethnic slur I've never heard about) and none of them could figure it out either. Nobody has been able, hitherto, to explain how "applying to a job" or "applying sunscreen" constitute any sort of attack on anybody's character.
It's really not that complicated of a joke.
I don't know, maybe this is my cow tools moment, but I am somewhat disturbed by the idea that if a joke isn't funny, it must actually be some kind of secret other joke, which is extremely offensive but also for some reason nobody can be bothered to explain how or why. What are you people talking about? jp×g🗯️ 04:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It’s a mild, and to me, totally inoffensive, pun on the word "applies". Perhaps too subtle for some. Definitely not worthy of the offense apparently taken. Lighten up folks, it is not sexist, racist or any of the other "isms" it is fashionable to take offense to these days. The worst you can reasonably claim is that it missed its target audience (zing), but this is Wikipedia, everything misses part of the audience. Cheers · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 10:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The real failure here was not giving her a beard, a robe, and a white Russian and captioning it "Mandy abides." ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ms. Rice-Davis at the time of the photographs was an attractive young woman notorious for her sexual activities with famous persons, activities within her rights. She and her estate have some right to privacy. I do not see any justification for using her image on this page. On Wikipedia, her name has become a catch phrase for an important editorial debate on neutrality, but that is no justification for using her image as the target of sexist ridicule. If she were a man or an elderly woman would the joke work? --agr (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WTF, people? It's just a really lame dad joke playing with the meaning of the word "applies" (she applies for a job, she applies sunscreen). It's not Groucho Marx, but it's certainly harmless humor and definitely not any sort of attack. If you don't think so, MFD is the right venue. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:56, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You misspelled her name on the fake CV; it's Rice-Davies, not Rice-Davis. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 12:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What does applying for a job or applying sunscreen have to with applying some obscure Wikipedia "rules"? And what does Ms. Rice-Davies (who I, like 99% of living Americans, have never heard of) have to do with any of this? Why was she chosen for the joke? Why is the sunscreen branded "X", is this some swipe at Elon Musk's new name for Twitter? Sunscreen is a subtle hint about online reputation management? wbm1058 (talk) 14:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I find this discussion far more interesting than the joke. Even after the joke was explained. -- llywrch (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Smallbones(smalltalk) 03:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems to be a man in the middle attack. But the Signpost editor is obviously the cat, above the fray. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 20:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC) —[reply]
- Visual humor should be a regular feature in Signpost. Hmmm, what metaphorically pairs with an image of "dead pig in the sunshine"? — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 20:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC) —[reply]
Funny, stupid, and not offensive at all, except in how bad the pun is.Andre🚐 04:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]