Deutschland Bundesregierung

Ternera (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hi everyone. I've been active at WP:EFFPR over the past few months replying to false positives that get reported. My reason for requesting the EFH right is so I can reply to reports where the filters triggered are private. Sometimes, I notice these reports go without answer for longer periods of time than reports where the filters triggered are public, and I believe I can be helpful by handling them when I see them. I have a basic understanding of regular expressions (I can generally read through them and have an idea of what is going on). I have read over the page and understand the secrecy of filter contents - I also have some other "advanced" rights like global rollback due to my involvement in anti-vandalism work and I'm a sysop over at the Rwanda Wikipedia. If the community does not think I'm a good fit for this, then I'm content to continue what I've been doing and replying to reports about public filters. Thank you for the input! Ternera (talk) 14:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The global rollback is a big plus, but I'm going to oppose this for now. Your global and local edit counts are relatively low, and 71 edits to EFFPR isn't as much as I'd like to see if that's going to be your main involvement with edit filters. Thanks for your help and interest in this area, but I think it's a bit early for EFH. —Ingenuity (t • c) 03:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I've had a look through, and the 71 edits to EFFPR locally are discouraging. Your sysop history on rwwiki has no involvement with the edit filters in the AF log, nor, as far as I can tell, any troubleshooting. So it would be an oppose for me as well, though I encourage you to help out with the public filters. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 04:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral, but slightly leaning on opposing. As someone pointed out, your EFFPR response count is too low according to XTools. I strongly encourage you to be involved more with public filters (such as regex additions or troubleshooting false positives) and much more responses to public filter reports on EFFPR, and when you try again in at least six months or in a year, you might have my full support. Don’t let my vote discourage you. Codename Noreste 🤔 Talk 14:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Oppose: As others have stated, you haven't edited EFFPR enough to warrant this right, and clerking reports on the page doesn't necessarily mean you need this perm still. You are a sysop on another wiki, but as EggRoll97 said, you have no involvement with filters there. I feel like after around a year, with more involvement with filters, you should be ready for this right. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 22:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdrawing this request. I see that I need even more experience before being trusted with this. I'll continue my involvement as I have been doing and hopefully have a successful request next year! Ternera (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]