Sind die Zitate unübersetzbar? Gibt es nicht vielleicht sogar eine deutsche Version? Sollte ein Artikel überhaupt aus einem Haufen aneinandergereihter Zitate bestehen?--92.78.108.223 03:25, 23. Feb. 2011 (CET)Beantworten

This article is ridiculously imbalanced and clearly written as an attack on the new President of Germany who is supported by all democratic parties. First of all, http://clemensheni.wordpress.com is both a personal blog and frequently expressing fringe views, not a reliable source, also per the German Wikipedia's local policies (Wikipedia:Weblinks#Einzelrichtlinien #2). (Among the views found on that blog are views that are clearly Islamophobic, even explicitly rejecting the well recognized existence of Islamophobia as such). Secondly, the criticism from what the respected Israeli academic Barry Rubin has called "a tiny group of people" waging "a relentless campaign" against the declaration ((they are about 4 or 5 and are, btw., all affiliated with a highly controversial Russian GONGO called "World Without Nazism", which is, according to Estonian security police, a pro-Soviet propaganda organisation founded in response to prosecution of Soviet war criminals[1]), is given disproportionate weight. One could mention the support this declaration or its contents have received from EU governments, from the European Parliament, from other international bodies, from large European parties including the European Greens, the European People's Party, or the way its proposals have been implemented as EU policy, which includes an all-European remembrance day and the Platform of European Memory and Conscience, co-founded, inter alia, by German government agencies. One could mention the support this declaration has received, as a courageous step to condemn totalitarianism, for example from the Jewish-American post-communist studies expert Vladimir Tismăneanu, who writes that the Prague Declaration and the Vilnius Declaration "…can be seen as the fulfillment of the second stage of postcommunist development in the region […] both documents condemn the atrocities of the last century and resolve to proceed on a path of democracy and tolerance." (Tismăneanu, Vladimir (2010). "Citizenship Restored". Journal of Democracy 21 (1): 128–135). Tataral 17:53, 25. Feb. 2012 (CET)Beantworten

As Barry Rubin writes, "A relentless campaign has been waged by a tiny group of people to persuade Jews and Israelis to oppose the June 3, 2008 Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism, as if it were some horrible anti-Semitic document. This is a slanderously wrong claim."[2] The Prague Declaration is signed by eminent Jewish voices such as philosopher André Glucksmann and democracy activist and politician Emanuelis Zingeris. Tataral 18:01, 25. Feb. 2012 (CET)Beantworten

die kritik von namhaften wissenschaftlern ist sachlich und belegt hier eingefügt und entspricht den standpunkten der neutralität. weitere auseinandersetzungen / kritiken / gegenstellungnahmen können gerne - ebenso sachlich und belegt - ebenfalls eingefügt werden. ich nehme den baustein wieder raus. vg --emma7stern 18:25, 25. Feb. 2012 (CET)Beantworten

You have obviously not read Wikipedia:Weblinks#Einzelrichtlinien. http://clemensheni.wordpress.com is a personal blog, not a reliable or acceptable source. The article clearly pushes fringe views. Tataral 18:30, 25. Feb. 2012 (CET)Beantworten

der blog ist nicht die referenz, sondern: Clemens Heni: Die „Prager Deklaration“, in: Tribüne. Zeitschrift zum Verständnis des Judentums, 49. Jahrgang, Heft 194, 2. Quartal 2010; der link ist lediglich ein service zum online einsehbaren teil. --emma7stern 18:33, 25. Feb. 2012 (CET)Beantworten

Könnte man noch ergänzen. Hier ist noch eine Stimme:

• Dovid Katz: „Prague’s declaration of disgrace“, The Jewish Chronicle, 21. Mai 2009.
• Dovid Kotz: „The Seventy Years Declaration and the Simple Truth“, Algemeiner Journal, 3. Februar 2012.

--Widerborst 14:08, 2. Mär. 2012 (CET)Beantworten